To Click or Not to Click
- Alan Young
- Feb 7
- 5 min read
Updated: Mar 2
On restraint, expectation, and the quiet cost of pressing the shutter
To click or not to click. That is the question.
Should I shoot indiscriminately, trusting probability and volume, or should I observe deliberately, dismissing shots I already know will fail? Sometimes the light is wrong. Sometimes the subject is static. Sometimes, even before I lift the camera to my eye, I know the photograph will not survive beyond the moment. And yet, I feel obliged to shoot anyway.
I’ve paid to be there. I’ve travelled miles. It’s freezing. I’m tired. I can’t go home with empty memory cards… can I?
The cost is not just fiscal, it is emotional. You’ve planned the trip, checked the weather more than once, watched forecasts shift, and considered wind direction and light. You’ve asked, and been given, permission by your partner to be selfish for a day, to step away from routine and responsibility and do something purely for yourself. That permission carries weight. It is borrowed time.
It creates an unspoken contract. You go out, and you return with something to show for it. Proof that the time was well spent. Proof that the absence was justified. The burden of returning empty-handed is heavy.
Digital photography makes this dilemma easier to ignore. Frames are cheap. Storage is plentiful. The shutter will happily fire twenty frames per second without complaint. Somewhere along the way, quantity has been mistaken for intent. I know photographers who return from a single outing with thousands of images. The logic is familiar. Surely this increases the odds of a winning frame. Surely one of them will work.
In the film era, that approach would have been unthinkable. Not because photographers were more virtuous, but because the cost enforced discipline. Every frame mattered. Each exposure carried consequence. Digital removed the constraint, but it did not remove the decision.
The expense did not disappear, it simply moved downstream. Into the culling. The sifting. The quiet frustration of scrolling through dozens, sometimes hundreds, of near-identical frames. Images you already suspected, at the moment of pressing the shutter, were not right. The cost is paid later, in time and attention, in decision fatigue, and in the slow erosion of clarity as you try to remember why you took the photograph in the first place.
I remember one outing in particular, after I finally caught my first kingfisher. The sense of relief was immediate. I had the image I had been trying to make for a long time. And yet, instead of stopping, I became click-happy. The bird stayed put, doing very little. Nothing was changing. The light offered no variation. The moment had already passed. Still, I kept clicking.
At the time, it felt justified. The subject was there. The opportunity felt rare. Digital frames were free, and the logic whispered that something else might happen if I just waited long enough. When I got home and began editing, the reality was obvious. Dozens of near-identical images. Slight changes in posture, marginal differences in head angle, nothing that altered the photograph in any meaningful way. The extra frames did not improve the image. They only delayed the realisation that I had already taken the photograph I came for.
As an aside, I showed those kingfisher images to fellow photographers. The response was casual, almost dismissive. Nice bird on a stick. Said kindly, without malice, but without ceremony. And they were right. It was the ubiquitous bird on a stick, a photograph many of us make at least once. But it was my bird on a stick, an image I had worked towards, waited for, and finally made. That realisation brought a surprising sense of peace. I did not need it to be more than it was.
Those comments stayed with me, not as criticism, but as guidance. They quietly influenced how I approached future shots, encouraging me to look beyond the obvious and to wait for behaviour, gesture, or light that transformed the subject into something more than a record. Try to avoid bird on a stick, unless, of course, that is exactly what you want.
I have returned home with both outcomes, success and failure, at least as they are perceived. Sometimes I come back quietly satisfied, knowing I have one frame, a single image of a kingfisher I’ve been trying to get for ages. In those moments, I am already thinking ahead, keen to get to the computer to see if what I felt in the field survives contact with the screen. Other times, the return is heavier.
You slump onto the sofa, glance at your partner, and hear the words before you’ve said anything yourself. No luck? Well, there’s always next time.
Those words are kind. They are meant to be. And yet they land with more weight than criticism ever could, because the disappointment is not really about luck. It is about expectation, about the quiet contract you made with yourself when you left the house that morning. This is where the pressure to click creeps in, not because the photograph deserves to exist, but because silence feels like failure, because returning with nothing feels like you have wasted not just time, but trust.
So you shoot, not out of conviction, but out of obligation.
My own practice has slowly shifted away from that. There are days when I return with fewer than a hundred frames. There are moments when I lift the camera to my eye, assess the light, the angle, the behaviour, and lower it again without pressing the shutter. Not because I am disciplined, and not because I am immune to doubt, but because I already know what the photograph will be.
Refusing to click is not passivity. It is a decision. It is an acknowledgement that not every moment needs to be turned into proof, that some experiences are complete without documentation, and that presence is sometimes enough.
Fewer frames do not guarantee better images, but they preserve clarity and intent. They allow you to remember why a frame was made, rather than hoping meaning will reveal itself later during editing. Sometimes the most honest outcome of a day’s photography is an empty card and a full memory. That is harder to accept. It does not justify itself easily. But it may be truer than pretending every outing must produce proof.
If this resonates, a small selection of related work can be found in my wildlife photography archive, alongside images shaped by patience, process, and time in the field.
Continue Exploring
If you found this piece useful or thought-provoking, you may also enjoy:
Related reading
Related work
Prints & context
A selection of images featured across the site are available as fine art prints, produced using archival pigment inks on specialist papers.
Comments